Page 73 - latribuna oct 19

(https://www.federalregister.gov/ up wanting more.
documents/2019/08/14/2019-17142/
Thus far, the new public charge rule has
inadmissibility-on-public-charge-grounds)
received over 260,000 opposing comments,
In other words, this rule helps the DHS and lawsuits have been filed by 19 states and
determine whether or not a foreigner the District of Columbia in an attempt to
can be denied a request, in relation to the block the implementation of the rule.
possibility of them requiring any form of
If all of the aforementioned measures fail,
public benefit at any point in the future. The
the rule will go into effect on October 15.
DHS will consider the person’s “totality of
circumstances” (age; health; family status;
assets, resources, and financial status; and
education and skills) when making the https://cis.org/Report/Public-Charge-Doctrine-
Fundamental-Principle-American-Immigration-Policy
determination.
https://www.kff.org/disparities-policy/fact-sheet/
public-charge-policies-for-immigrants-implications-
So what the rule is trying to tell us, is that
for-health-coverage/
the United States is only willing to grant

these permits to people within working age,
who also happen to be in almost immaculate
health—because if they aren’t, or if they
are found likely to become ill in the future,
they’ll need healthcare. And that’s only for
US born Americans. The good ol’ taxpayers.

That means if you don’t have any properties,
or relatives who are citizens of the United
States, or if you’re poor and don’t speak
impeccable English, you’ll probably be
deemed inadmissible.

This to me is only one more display of the
Trump administration’s bigoted outlook on
migration, and in light of the upcoming
2020 elections, it seems as if he’s been saving
his most extreme actions for the very end of
his presidency, to ensure his supporters end
73